No products in the basket.
Oxford vs. Stratford
- Home
- / Shakespeare Authorship Question Explained
- / Oxford vs. Stratford
Oxford vs. Stratford
‘… for truth is truth though never so old, and time cannot make that false which was once true’
~ Edward de Vere in a letter dated 07 May 1603
‘… for truth is truth To the end of reckoning’ ~ Measure for Measure V. i.
The plays of William Shakespeare are rich in learning and wit. Their author took plots from Chaucer, from works of Roman and English history and from Italian, French and Latin sources that had not yet been translated into English. They display a comprehensive knowledge of law, medicine, astronomy, music, of Italian and French customs and topography, a love of the English language and an eagerness to improve the human condition through wisdom and learning.
They caricature distinguished courtiers such as Lord Burghley (Polonius), Robert Cecil (Richard III) and Christopher Hatton (Malvolio) and are predominantly concerned with kings, courts and the nobility. Looking at the documentary record dating from the lifetime of each – Edward de Vere (1550-1604) and William of Stratford (1564-1616) – the following observations are gleaned.
From a literate, theatre-loving family | Yes | No |
Record of early education | Yes | No |
Attendance at University | Yes | No |
Studied Law | Yes | No |
Praised for love of learning | Yes | No |
Spoke the French and Italian languages | Yes | No |
Owned French and Italian books | Yes | No |
Owned English books | Yes | No |
Read, spoke and wrote Latin | Yes | No |
Known for his love of music | Yes | No |
Known for interest in astronomy | Yes | No |
Knowledge of Italy | Yes | No |
Praised for knowledge of foreign arts | Yes | No |
Owned books on medicine | Yes | No |
Loved Chaucer and owned his works | Yes | No |
Known for love of history | Yes | No |
Owned history books | Yes | No |
Known for love of English literature | Yes | No |
Reformer of the English language | Yes | No |
Known to other playwrights | Yes | No |
Known to other poets | Yes | No |
Known to scholars | Yes | No |
Known to Queen Elizabeth I | Yes | No |
Known to distinguished courtiers | Yes | No |
Could write in Italic hand | Yes | No |
Had a sense of humour | Yes | No |
Praised for his wit | Yes | No |
Educated his children | Yes | No |
Connected to public and Court theatre | Yes | Yes |
Worked with actors | Yes | Yes |
Taught others to recite lines | Yes | No |
Connected to a grammar school | Yes | No |
Prodigious writer and improviser of verse | Yes | No |
Wished to improve the life of others through books of wisdom and learning | Yes | No |
On these facts alone the candidacy of William of Stratford as the author of Shakespeare’s plays is a non-starter, while Edward de Vere, whose plays are said by orthodox commentators to be entirely lost, fits the profile of the missing poet ‘Shakespeare’ like a glove. The first complete folio edition of Shakespeare’s works was published in 1623 and dedicated to Edward de Vere’s son-in- law, the Earl of Montgomery. Neither William of Stratford nor any of his family or friends ever claimed that he was a poet, dramatist or writer of any kind.